Economists Uncut

What’s Bitcoin’s Next High? On-Chain Data Reveals Surge Coming David Lin (Uncut) 01-27-2025

“The Hidden Secret Behind Bitcoin & Crypto Will Blow Your Mind” – Whitney Webb’s LATEST 2025 WARNING

We’ve had so many wealth transfers in this country, we’re at the point where the robber barons, the elite bankers, whatever you want to call them, have basically stolen everything. So now that they have everything, they want to move to deflationary money. And so the only problem they have left, the only hurdle left across, right, is sort of this extreme US government debt crisis that is about to be upon the United States and essentially been admitted by big time congressmen like Paul Ryan very recently.

And one of the ways Paul Ryan pitched getting out of that problem was starting to regulate dollar stable coins, many of which have now surpassed several nation states as the biggest holders of US treasuries or US government debt in the world. Over the years, as they’ve gained popularity and reached unbelievable price highs, there has been a lot of skepticism about the cryptocurrency industry, particularly as regards the government’s role in its creation and rapidly growing popularity. Quite a number of renowned investigators have posited that Bitcoin might have been created by the US National Security Agency, NSA, to further some yet-to-be-revealed deep state agenda.

This becomes more believable when you realize that Bitcoin’s secure hash algorithm 256 is the direct work of Glenn Lilly, a mathematician who designed and eventually published the algorithm in 2001 under the direction of the NSA. Jeff Mann, a former NSA cryptanalyst, also recently revealed that it’s feasible that the NSA created Bitcoin as a means of gathering intelligence about its enemies. According to renowned author and investigative journalist Whitney Webb, Bitcoin, and by extension, the rest of the cryptocurrency industry, might have been created to further an even more sinister agenda, to help the global elites achieve their dreams of disinflationary money, so all the ill-gotten wealth they’ve amassed over the years will keep multiplying while the common person loses everything due to the constant devaluation of fiat currencies.

Here is a tweet from Whitney exposing this agenda. The biggest banks and a cadre of spooky currency speculators have funded and now control most of the infrastructure underlying Bitcoin—energy, chips, ISPs, and general crypto infrastructure—with the openly stated goal of having it be only an asset you don’t and can’t spend. The US government and this small elite faction hold most of the Bitcoin, and once their financial control grid is complete, they inflate its price through the roof.

As Catherine Austin Fitz has said of the elite’s plans, once you steal everything, you want to move to a disinflationary system. These elites, who have a lot of ties to the Epstein network, hold so much Bitcoin collectively, and when currencies implode, which is something the currency speculators who back so much key crypto infrastructure have probably done in the past, pumping gold and silver instead will make too many other actors—including other governments like China and Russia—very wealthy, while pumping Bitcoin will make only a specific, largely US-based cabal very wealthy. When they collapse currencies, they will buy up everything they didn’t manage to buy up during COVID, and then install their new and beyond Orwellian financial surveillance grid in place, using Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

Whitney dives deeper into the situation in a recent interview with The Jimmy Dore Show. As we present clips from the interview, please take a little time to like this video, subscribe to the channel, and turn on post notifications for more videos like this. We appreciate the support and hope you enjoy the video.

to Bitcoin and then basically bumping, boosting the price of Bitcoin through the roof, essentially, as a way to sort of allow the US government to debt pardon itself. And one of the reasons—well, I don’t want to get too far ahead of myself, so I’ll come back to that later—but basically, we’ve had so many wealth transfers in this country, we’re at the point where the robber barons, the elite bankers, whatever you want to call them, have basically stolen everything. So now that they have everything, they want to move to deflationary money.

And so the only problem they have left, the only hurdle left across, right, is sort of this extreme US government debt crisis that is about to be upon the United States and essentially been admitted by big-time congressmen like Paul Ryan very recently. And one of the ways Paul Ryan pitched getting out of that problem was starting to regulate dollar stable coins, many of which have now surpassed several nation states as the biggest holders of US treasuries or US government debt in the world, right? So you have the biggest dollar stable coin like Tether now holding more treasuries than—well, I forget exactly where it is in the ranking, but it’s bigger than Germany and some other countries that have significant amounts of reserves. Unfortunately, I don’t have figures at the top of my head right now, but it’s a very easy search to find those exact numbers.

But it’s very significant and being talked about pretty widely. So stable coins are becoming a way for the US government to service its debt. And this is sort of being done throughout Latin America, especially where you have sort of this de facto, what I would call sort of covert dollarization happening.

So like you wreck an economy like Argentina via the IMF, for example, which the US military and documents published by WikiLeaks several years ago was referred to as a financial weapon of US empire, right? So if you like wreck an economy, and you destroy their currency, and then people flock to Tether or USDC or some other because they can’t get their hand on physical dollars, they can get their hand on virtual dollars. And that’s happening in a big way in a lot of these economies that have become increasingly destabilized, arguably on purpose by the US power structure. And then you have them becoming de facto dollarized, as opposed to sort of formal dollarization, which took place decades ago in places like Ecuador, El Salvador, where those countries essentially lose a significant amount of their financial sovereignty, because they’re sort of at the whim of the Federal Reserve, which they have zero control over.

So you’re saying in a case like that, all right, so their currency has been destroyed, partly through IMF policy or, or entirely, so World Bank or the multilateral development banking system among, you know, there’s these vulture capitalist figures that have been a big issue in Argentina as well. Most of them are American, like Paul Singer, for example, is probably one of the most notorious BlackRock is also one. And, you know, Javier Millet in Argentina has been making wet deals with them.

Yeah, he doesn’t say a flair to BlackRock, or JPMorgan. You know, plenty of other, you know, or Silicon Valley, he’s like, No, take over our government, please. It’s kind of funny.

He’s like, yeah, like libertarians cheer him on, because he’s like, you know, he’s like, I’m going to get rid of the Ministry of Education, it’s wasteful. And that, you know, maybe it is, I don’t know, I’m not an expert on waste. And, you know, the Ministry of Education in Argentina, but he’s pitched replacing it with Facebook’s AI to train everyone in, you know, all the young people in Argentina for the future of work.

You know, that doesn’t sound like a great alternative to me. Well, it’s hard to tell. I mean, is that like doctrinaire libertarianism? I mean, libertarianism has become so self contradictory at this point.

Like, I don’t know who the libertarians are, who the tech right are, it seems like libertarianism allows for infinite expansion of tech power, which I guess he’s for. Because I think there was a deliberate effort by people like Peter Thiel, for example, in the Silicon Valley figures that frame themselves as libertarian to sort of hijack what people used to consider libertarianism, which was like a lot of concern about decreasing the size of government, maximizing freedom, maximizing civil liberty, things like that. That is not Peter Thiel libertarianism like at all.

But because he’s sort of been able to, you know, mask himself is that it’s allowed him to sort of develop this other brand of libertarianism that you could argue is sort of taking over or really overshadowing the other type that perhaps, you know, may have been more prominent in some circles a few decades ago, right? Because there was a lot of commonality between anti war left and sort of anti war libertarians. And now that ability, that bridge that existed between those two groups is becoming, you know, it’s being attacked, it’s definitely been attacked. And there’s a lot of libertarians now with this current faction that’s coming into power that are very much cheering on what, you know, seems very clearly to be an expansion of government actually in the surveillance state, you know.

Whitney warns that the US government, Silicon Valley and Wall Street bankers are using Bitcoin and stablecoins like Tether or USDT to create an alternative, confiscatable, and centrally controlled financial system that will help them belong their wealth and avoid the inevitable collapse of the current monetary system. While the US government continues to assure citizens that it won’t create a CBDC, Whitney warns that stablecoins like USDT have already been earmarked as the digital dollar system. One of her tweets on the topic reads, Tether was intimately involved in the FTX scandal, has the FBI and Secret Service on its platform to surveil its users, openly states its main goal is to help spread dollar hegemony globally, and seizes people’s USDT whenever the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control puts them on their naughty list.

It is not freedom money. It is the newest phase of the US dollar debt slavery system, and easily acts as a de facto CBDC in terms of its threats to financial liberty. In another tweet, Whitney talks about one of President Trump’s recent executive orders, which bans the creation of a CBDC in the United States.

She describes his action as a fakeout designed to take focus from the fact that dollar stablecoins pose an even greater threat. It is a provable fakeout and what the banking cartel has been asking for, Whitney began in her tweet. Trump’s executive order is all about dollar stablecoins being used to extend dollar hegemony, and dollar stablecoins are just as programmable, surveillable, and seizable as a CBDC.

The only difference is that the central bank isn’t issuing them directly, and it maintains the two-tier banking system, which is what Wall Street has been lobbying for once digital dollar discussions began in earnest. During her interview, Whitney discusses an even bigger threat to our privacy and freedoms, the use and growing popularity of artificial intelligence. I do want to point out really quick, putting, so I think DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency, is really a Trojan horse for putting as much of government in the hands of AI as possible.

And I think when you do that, that doesn’t necessarily mean smaller government, perhaps less humans in the workforce, but having like AI run all these different departments and programs and whatever doesn’t necessarily mean the government is shrinking. It can mean the government human workforce is shrinking, but it’s not necessarily the same thing. So we’ll have to pay close attention to how that develops over time.

Because I suspect someone like Elon Musk, for example, who obviously is positioned himself to have undue power considering that no one voted for him, is a big proponent of carbon taxes and carbon markets and a lot of stuff that conservatives and libertarians certainly don’t like, and certainly would be in expansion of government, you’re creating a whole new market, essentially that civilians and corporations alike would have to play in order to meet those quotas or however they choose to set it up. Um, and I think ultimately, it’s very, very problematic, putting AI in charge of government. It’s actually something that Eric Schmidt and Henry Kissinger cheered on in their book, the age of AI, our human future, a very misleading title.

It’s about the post human future that they envision. And basically, the way they sort of describe it, and I would recommend people read the book for themselves. But I sort of, you know, my interpretation of it is that it’s the ultimate kind of Wizard of Oz cover for the government to get away with whatever it wants.

And honestly, like Henry Kissinger’s wet dream, no wonder he was so excited about AI. Because essentially, you know, you can claim that, you know, they argue that AI will become so much more intelligent than humans and think so differently that it could never explain how it reaches its conclusions to people, which envisions a future of computer says no computer says yes, computer issues that and you can’t question it, it can’t explain itself. We must trust that it’s in a kind of a religious way that it’s so much smarter than anything, anything else.

So if it says, yeah, Nuki ran, for example, and and you know, and then they get in trouble for it or something, they’ll be like, well, it was the computer and it’s so much more intelligent than us humans. You know, I mean, that’s basically a way for them to get away with whatever they want. Just be like, well, actually, the super intelligent artificial general intelligence that’s smarter than God himself told us to do it.

And we can’t question that now, can we? I mean, that’s basically sort of the setup. And, you know, hopefully, that’s not the same thing Elon Musk and Ramaswamy have in mind. But I don’t know.

I mean, the lines between Eric Schmidt world and Peter Thiel verse world are actually pretty thin. They’re both on the steering committee of the Bilderberg conference. And they agree on a lot more than they don’t.

They’re both very closely aligned with the Department of Defense. As it comes to AI, Eric Schmidt basically wrote the game plan for how national security would use AI as head of the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence a few years ago. And of course, Peter Thiel, through many of his companies and the company he backs, is a major military contractor with a lot of ties to the national security state.

And of course, not just the Department of Defense and Thiel’s case, but also the CIA. And, you know, it’s, they’re really not that different in the end of the day, I think their sales pitches are different and how they frame stuff is different. So this particular camp, that’s sort of claimed that they’re the Silicon Valley, libertarians are cloaking themselves in a lot of words like innovation, efficiency, and all of this stuff.

But the problem is, you know, AI as an industry is very overhyped. So for example, you could have a company, say, like one company I wrote about during COVID-19 is an Israeli company called Diagnostic Robotics. And so they were picked by the Rhode Island governor at the time, who later became Biden’s Commerce Secretary, to basically predict COVID outbreaks before they happen in Rhode Island.

And they said themselves that their algorithm was roughly like 75% accurate. But that’s like, you know, the company’s opinion, that wasn’t independently vetted or anything. So it’s probably closer to 60 or 50%, like a coin toss.

So is it really more efficient to put an algorithm like that in charge of deciding public health policy, or if a particular community is locked down, and its economic activity halted, or something like that? That’s just one example. I mean, obviously, AI is being applied to every sector. But there’s been a lot of grift in this particular field.

And it’s also happened with, you know, a former DARPA director had sort of a defense tech company, her name’s Regina Dugan, when Obama was in power, and they got basically outed for having that it was, I think it was for detecting IEDs, or the probability of them or something, I forget exactly what it was about. But it was found to literally be like a fraudulent algorithm. It was no better than a coin toss, and nothing happened to her.

So this type of stuff happens in government all the time. And just because Elon Musk and Ramaswamy are at the helm of it doesn’t mean that’s going to happen. Specifically, when you look at Vivek Ramaswamy’s, you know, track record and pharma world of pump and dumps and things like that, you know, this type of waste can still happen, even if the government workforce is smaller.

So it’ll be interesting to see exactly what those policies are. But it’s important to note that those people at Doge, and also, you know, David Sachs, as the AI cryptos are, who’s also part of the PayPal mafia, none of them, as far as I know, have to divest from their investment interests. There is so much going on underground that we are not being told.

After all, our governments have never been a bastion of truth and honesty. But whether you choose to heed the warnings of journalists like Whitney Webb or not, it’s important to always question the official narrative and do your own research to look into the allegations. The future of humanity might be at stake here, and it’s only by questioning everything that we can hope to get closer to the truth and avert this calamity.

Please share your thoughts on Whitney Webb’s warnings about Bitcoin, stablecoins, and artificial intelligence. Do you think our concerns are justified and worth looking into? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below. If you liked this video and want more like this, please indicate by giving it a thumbs up, subscribing to the channel, and activating the notifications bell for timely notifications on our uploads.

Thanks for watching.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button